NSWC-11 Belleville Washer Reliability Model

This tool estimates the failure rate of a Belleville washer — also called a Belleville spring, disc spring, or conical spring washer — using the multiplying-factor model from the Naval Surface Warfare Center Handbook of Reliability Prediction Procedures for Mechanical Equipment (NSWC-11), Chapter 4, Section 4.4.6. A Belleville washer flattens under load, producing radial and circumferential strains; this elastic deformation is the spring action. They are capable of providing very high loads at small deflections, with the highest stress occurring at the top inner edge.

Unlike the helical-spring models, the Belleville model is built around a base failure rate already expressed per unit time (2.6 failures / 106 hours), scaled by a product of dimensionless multiplying factors that capture the washer geometry, material, deflection, compressive-stress geometry and cycle rate. The result feeds directly into FMECA as FPMH / FIT / MTBF.

NSWC-11 Section 4.4.6 Belleville Washer Failure Rate Calculator
Belleville Washer Failure Rate — Disc / Conical Spring Washer (NSWC-11 Eq. 4-18)
Washer Geometry & Material
Eₘ (Table 4-2) and Tₛ (Table 4-3) auto-filled. Select “Custom” to enter your own. Eₘ (modulus of elasticity) is used for spring washers.
Outer edge diameter of the washer.
Bore diameter. Diameter ratio R = OD / ID drives CS.
Stock thickness of the disc. Ct reference = 0.025 in.
~28.5×106 psi for steel. From Table 4-2 when a material is selected.
Used for CY. From Table 4-3 when a material is selected.
~0.30 for steel. Used in the inner-edge stress estimate (Eq 4-17).
Loading Conditions
Working deflection of the washer. Cf reference = 0.055 in.
Operating frequency. CCS floors at 0.100 for ≤30 cyc/min.
Corrosive Environment & Manufacturing
CR = 1.0 when protection is applied (Section 4.3.10); higher from experience.
CM = 1.0 for acceptable QC (Section 4.3.11); higher from experience.
Results — Multiplying Factors
Diameter Ratio, R = OD / ID
Inner-Edge Stress, S (psi)
Eq 4-17 estimate (informational)
Elasticity Factor, CE
(Eₘ / 28.5×106)3 — Table 4-2
Thickness Factor, Ct
(t / 0.025)3 — Fig 4.16
Washer-Size Factor, CD
(1.20 / OD)6 — Fig 4.17
Deflection Factor, Cf
(f / 0.055)3 — Fig 4.18
Tensile-Strength Factor, CY
(190 000 / Tₛ)3 — Table 4-3
Compressive-Stress Factor, CS
f(R) — Fig 4.19
Cycle-Rate Factor, CCS
Fig 4.20
Results — Predicted Failure Rate (FMECA Inputs)

The Belleville base failure rate λSP,B = 2.6 failures / 106 hours is already time-based, so λSP is in FPMH directly — no cycle-to-time conversion is required.

Predicted Failure Rate, λSP (FPMH)
Failures Per Million Hours
Failure Rate (FIT)
Failures in Time (per 109 h)
MTBF (hours)
MTBF (years)
Show detailed calculation steps
Model Explanation

1. Inner-Edge Bending Stress (Eq. 4-17)

When a Belleville washer is loaded it tends to flatten, causing radial and circumferential strains. Stress is not distributed uniformly; the highest stress occurs at the top inner edge and is estimated by NSWC-11 as:

S = EM · f · R · t / [ (1 − μ²) · a² ]     a = OD / 2

where S is the bending stress (lb/in²), EM the modulus of elasticity, f the deflection, μ Poisson’s ratio, R a dimension factor, t the material thickness and a = OD/2. This stress is shown for reference; the failure-rate model below is driven by the dimensionless multiplying factors rather than by S directly. The diameter ratio R = OD/ID is used as the dimension factor in this estimate.

2. Failure Rate Model (Eq. 4-18)

The failure rate of a Belleville washer is obtained by scaling a base rate by a product of multiplying factors, each capturing one design or operating influence on the base rate:

λSP = λSP,B · CE · Ct · CD · Cf · CY · CS · CCS · CR · CM

with the base failure rate λSP,B = 2.6 failures / 106 hours. Because the base rate is already per-hour, λSP is reported in FPMH directly.

FactorEquationEffect on base failure rate
CE(EM / 28.5×106)3Modulus of elasticity (Table 4-2). Reference: Hard Drawn Steel, EM = 28.5×106.
Ct(t / 0.025)3Material thickness (Fig 4.16). Thicker stock raises stress and the failure rate.
CD(1.20 / OD)6Washer size (Fig 4.17). Larger outside diameter lowers the factor steeply.
Cf(f / 0.055)3Washer deflection under load (Fig 4.18). More deflection raises the factor.
CY(190 000 / TS)3Tensile strength (Table 4-3). Reference: Copper-Beryllium, TS = 190 000 psi.
CSf(R), R = OD/IDCompressive-stress geometry (Fig 4.19). See equation below.
CCSpiecewise in CRSpring cycle rate (Fig 4.20). See equation below.
CR1.0 (protected)Corrosive environment (Section 4.3.10). 1.0 when protection is applied; higher from experience.
CM1.0 (good QC)Manufacturing process (Section 4.3.11). 1.0 for acceptable QC; higher from experience.

3. Compressive-Stress Factor, CS (Fig. 4.19)

CS = (6 / (π ln R))3 · [ (R − 1)/ln R − 1 ] · [ (R − 1)/2 ] · [ (R − 1)/R ]2     R = OD / ID

CS depends only on the diameter ratio R = outside diameter / inside diameter. It rises from roughly 0.16 at R = 1.1 to about 3.2 at R = 5.1, mirroring how the inner-edge compressive stress concentration grows with a wider washer. The model is valid over approximately 1.1 ≤ R ≤ 5.1.

4. Cycle-Rate Factor, CCS (Fig. 4.20)

CCS = 0.100   for CR ≤ 30 cyc/min
CCS = CR / 300   for 30 < CR ≤ 300 cyc/min
CCS = (CR / 300)3   for CR > 300 cyc/min

Higher cyclic frequencies generate additional heating and dynamic-stress effects that elevate the effective failure rate. At low cycle rates the factor floors at 0.100, reflecting the near-static duty of many washer applications.

5. Time-Based Reliability Metrics (FPMH, FIT, MTBF)

λSP [FPMH] = λSP   (already per 106 h)
FIT = λSP × 103  ·  MTBF [hours] = 106 / λSP
MTBF [years] = MTBF [hours] / (24 × 365.25)

MTBF is the inverse of the failure rate and assumes a constant (exponential) failure rate, a reasonable approximation away from the wear-out region.

This calculator implements the NSWC-11 Belleville washer multiplying-factor model (Section 4.4.6, Eq. 4-18) directly from the handbook equations and the factor curves of Figures 4.16–4.20. The inner-edge stress (Eq. 4-17) is shown for reference only and is not used in the failure-rate product. For certified reliability predictions, designs near material limits, or safety-critical applications, consult the full NSWC-11 handbook tables and/or perform physical testing.
NSWC-11 Reference Figures & Graphs

The five charts below reproduce the NSWC-11 Belleville-washer multiplying-factor figures (Figures 4.16–4.20) directly from their governing equations, so they match the handbook curves to within hand-plotting tolerance. On the geometry-driven charts a marker tracks the values implied by your current inputs (thickness t, outside diameter OD, deflection f, diameter ratio R = OD/ID); the cycle-rate chart marker tracks your cycle-rate input.

FIG 4.16Material-Thickness Factor, Ct. Ct = (t / 0.025)3. Referenced to a 0.025 in thickness; rises with the cube of thickness. Log scale. Marker = your thickness t.
FIG 4.17Washer-Size Factor, CD. CD = (1.20 / OD)6. Referenced to a 1.20 in outside diameter; falls steeply as OD grows. Log scale. Marker = your outside diameter OD.
FIG 4.18Washer-Deflection Factor, Cf. Cf = (f / 0.055)3. Referenced to a 0.055 in deflection. Log scale. Marker = your deflection f.
FIG 4.19Compressive-Stress Factor, CS. CS = (6/(π ln R))3·[(R−1)/ln R−1]·[(R−1)/2]·[(R−1)/R]2, R = OD/ID. Linear scale. Marker = your diameter ratio R.
FIG 4.20Cycle-Rate Factor, CCS. CCS = 0.100 for CR ≤ 30; CR/300 for 30 < CR ≤ 300; (CR/300)3 for CR > 300. Linear scale. Marker = your cycle-rate input.

Charts are computed directly from the NSWC-11 Figure 4.16–4.20 equations. Table 4-1 reproduces the handbook failure-mode listing; Tables 4-2 and 4-3 provide the modulus and tensile-strength multiplying factors.

Table 4-1 — Failure Modes for a Mechanical Spring

Type of Spring / Stress ConditionFailure ModesFailure Causes
Static
(constant deflection or constant load)
  • Load loss
  • Creep
  • Set
  • Yielding
  • Parameter change
  • Hydrogen embrittlement
Cyclic
(10,000 cycles or more during the life of the spring)
  • Fracture
  • Damaged spring end
  • Fatigue failure
  • Buckling
  • Surging
  • Complex stress change as a function of time
  • Excessive mean stress, unidirectional operation
  • Material flaws
  • High-temperature operation
  • Imperfection on inside diameter of the spring
  • Hydrogen embrittlement
  • Stress concentration due to tooling marks and rough finishes
  • Sharp bends on spring ends (extension springs)
  • Surface imperfections (high cycle with no shot peening)
  • Corrosive atmosphere
  • Misalignment
  • Excessive stress range of reverse stress
  • Cycling temperature
  • Low-frequency vibration
  • High-frequency vibration
Dynamic
(intermittent occurrences of a load surge)
  • Fracture
  • Fatigue failure
  • Maximum load ratio exceeded
  • Insufficient space for operation
  • Shock impulse
  • Surface defects
  • Excessive stress range of reverse stress
  • Resonance surging

Table 4-2 — Moduli of Rigidity and Elasticity for Typical Spring Materials

For Belleville washers the modulus of elasticity EM (and CE) is used; EM applies to torsion springs, flat springs and spring washers.

Material GM (lbs/in2 × 106) CG EM (lbs/in2 × 106) CE
Ferrous
Music Wire11.81.0829.01.05
Hard Drawn Steel11.51.0028.51.00
Chrome Steel11.20.9229.01.05
Silicon-Manganese10.80.8329.01.05
Stainless 302, 304, 31610.00.6728.00.98
Stainless 17-7 PH10.50.7629.51.04
Stainless 42011.00.8829.01.05
Stainless 43111.40.9729.51.11
Non-Ferrous
Spring Brass5.00.0815.00.15
Phosphor Bronze6.00.1415.00.15
Beryllium Copper7.00.2317.00.21
Inconel10.50.7631.01.09
Monel9.50.5626.00.76
CG = (GM / 11.5×106)3      CE = (EM / 28.5×106)3

Table 4-3 — Material Tensile Strength Multiplying Factor, CY

Typical values based on a wire diameter of 0.1 in. Actual tensile strength varies with section size. Reference material: Copper-Beryllium at TS = 190 000 psi (CY = 1.00).

Material Tensile Strength, TS (lbs/in2 × 103) CY
Brass1105.15
Phosphor Bronze1253.51
Monel 4001452.25
Inconel 6001581.74
Monel K5001751.28
Copper-Beryllium1901.00
17-7 PH, RH 9502100.74
Hard Drawn Steel2160.68
Stainless Steel 302, 18-82270.59
Spring Temper Steel2450.47
Chrome Silicon2680.36
Music Wire2950.27
CY = (190 000 / TS)3   —   where TS = Tensile Strength (lbs/in2)
Source & Important Notices
  • Source model: Naval Surface Warfare Center, Handbook of Reliability Prediction Procedures for Mechanical Equipment (NSWC-11), Chapter 4 (Springs), Section 4.4.6 Belleville Washer, Eq. 4-17 / 4-18 and Figures 4.16–4.20.
  • Direct implementation. The multiplying factors are computed from the published handbook equations; the base failure rate is the handbook value of 2.6 failures / 106 hours. The inner-edge stress (Eq. 4-17) is informational only.
  • Verify critical designs. Always confirm against the full NSWC-11 handbook and physical testing for safety-critical or high-cycle applications. This tool is a reference aid, not a substitute for engineering judgment.

Cite This Work